Hi
I had tried defining the c2 members as backup pool for c1 members pool. But that doesn't achieve loadbalancing on failover.
Hmm.... I do not really understand this. Having c2 defined as backup pool for c1 would be my recommendation and I dot not understand why you do not achieve loadbalancing among c2's members? You should get loadbalancing for among c2 members as well as c1 members unless you have some kind og session persistence defined on the c2 pool?
regards,
Karsten